feed me and tell me i'm pretty bear iphone case

However, for a brief moment I thought, "What if this were true and Nokia could change the Windows Phone interface?" The idea made me a little nervous and brought to mind a topic that's been debated before but has yet to be settled: are custom UIs on smartphones and tablets good or bad?. It's an issue that comes up most often with Android because of all the custom skins. Unless they're offering a pure Google experience device, manufacturers like Samsung, LG, Motorola, and HTC are free to skin their smartphones and tablets with their personalized versions of Android. On the one hand, there's value in the openness of Android, as it gives companies the opportunity to innovate and hopefully make the OS better.

I also understand why manufacturers do it, With limitations on what you can do with hardware design and specs, tweaking the software is feed me and tell me i'm pretty bear iphone case an easy way to differentiate oneself from the competition, On the other hand, if the UI isn't done well, it makes for a horrible user experience and can complicate things like software updates, Perhaps learning from other people's mistakes and its own experience with Windows Mobile, Microsoft took a different approach with Windows Phone, The company places pretty strict restrictions on what manufacturers can do with the hardware and software, All Windows Phone handsets must have the three requisite buttons below the screen (start, back, and search) and a dedicated camera button, As I mentioned earlier, Nokia, as well as all Windows Phone partners, can only personalize the software via hubs and applications..

Microsoft argues that this more closed system offers a more consistent user experience, so even if a customer upgraded from one Windows Phone to another, he or she would instantly know how to use it since the UI is the same. So what's the better philosophy?. Of course, there isn't one definitive right answer. After years of reviewing numerous smartphones of varying platforms, it's a question I still struggle with. I do, however, tend to fall more on the side of having a consistent UI across a platform, with some room for some customization.

I don't want to see the choice and openness you get with Android stymied, After all, custom skins have contributed to some of the great features found on Android today, However, the differences in Android UIs can also be confusing; some just plain stink, and dare I mention the dreaded f word?, In a perfect world, we wouldn't have to root our devices, and there would simply be an option to choose between the stock UI or custom UI, Until feed me and tell me i'm pretty bear iphone case this happens, I think there is value in Microsoft's thinking regarding having a universal look and feel across devices, Plus, Windows Phone still offers some customization via its Start screen and allows manufacturers to add their own touches like HTC Hub..

However, my take might differ from yours, so I'd love to get everyone's feelings on this issue. Please share your thoughts in the comments section below. After concept photos of a reimagined Windows Phone user interface surface, Crave's chief correspondent revisits an old debate: are custom UIs good or bad?. In middle school, my best friend and I used live by the motto "dare to be different." We were all about expressing our individuality by wearing mismatched clothes and staging silly stunts just to stand out from the crowd, but in the case of tech, can being too different be a liability?.